Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1237

reference
41-tree-1
name
1237
tree-preservation-order

undefined

41-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.960368 50.781954)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.960326 50.781950,-0.960328 50.781958,-0.960334 50.781965,-0.960343 50.781972,-0.960368 50.781977,-0.960381 50.781976,-0.960393 50.781972,-0.960402 50.781966,-0.960409 50.781959,-0.960411 50.781950,-0.960409 50.781942,-0.960403 50.781934,-0.960394 50.781928,-0.960382 50.781924,-0.960369 50.781923,-0.960356 50.781924,-0.960344 50.781928,-0.960334 50.781934,-0.960328 50.781941,-0.960326 50.781950)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL